The racial and economic bias is not a valid argument against the death penalty.It is an argument against the courts and their unfair system of sentencing.
The racial and economic bias is not a valid argument against the death penalty.It is an argument against the courts and their unfair system of sentencing.If an error does occur, and an innocent person is executed, then the problem lies in the court system, not in the death penalty.Tags: Business Plan For A BankPowerpoint Presentation On Dialogue WritingArgumentative Essay Rubric 9th GradeCritical Thinking Elementary SchoolHow To Become A Successful Creative WriterBusiness Plan For A Small RestaurantSamuel Johnson EssaysEssay About Theme For English B
Is a murderer's life any less sacred than the victim's is?
Can capital punishment, the death penalty, execution, legal murder, or whatever a society wishes to call it, be morally justifiable?
Opponents of the death penalty do not agree and have a valid argument when they say, “The claims that capital punishment reduces violent crime is inconclusive and certainly not proven.”The fourth argument is that the length of stay on death row, with its endless appeals, delays, technicalities, and retrials, keep a person waiting for death for years on end. This is the least credible argument against capital punishment.
The main cause of such inefficiencies is the appeals process, which allows capital cases to bounce back and forth between state and federal courts for years on end.
The legality and use of the death penalty in the United States of America is a highly controversial issue.
Death Penalty Essay Against Essay On Peer Pressure
Different people have different opinions, of course, which often stem back to morality, cost, or personal judgement.The underlying question in this issue is if any kind of killing, regardless of reason, can be accepted.In this Today our society is assaulted with a barrage of violent images, whether fictional or not. This rationalization is required in order have a society where capital punishment is legal.The idea of putting another human to death is hard to completely fathom.The physical mechanics involved in the act of execution are easy to grasp, but the emotions involved in carrying out a death sentence on another person, regardless of how much they deserve it, is beyond my own understanding.Thus arises one of the great moral dilemmas of our time.Should taking the life of one who has taken the life of others be considered an available punishment? This is an ideal that the majority of people can agree upon to a certain extent.For this reason taking the life of another has always been considered the most deplorable of crimes, one worthy of the harshest available punishment.Statistics show that the poor and minorities are more likely to receive the death penalty. It can’t be disputed sadly, the rich are more likely to get off with a lesser sentence, and this bias is wrong.However, this is yet another problem of our current court system.