Tags: Two Major Kinds Of EssayAmerican Culture In Movies EssayPolicy And ProcedureAqa Science Homework Sheet AnswersTo Build A Fire EssayIs Gatsby Great EssayAssign Function Keys Windows 7
This could be interesting to take into consideration since it defends the principle that we should protect innocent people.In this case, one would have to look at whether or not saving the life of many is a good reason to kill someone who is most likely a criminal.In my opinion you have a very good principle and argument to justify your claim.
Their data base used nationwide data from 3,054 US counties from 1977-1996. Kaj Gottings found a statistically significant relationship between executions, pardons and homicide.
Specifically each additional execution reduces homicides by 5 to 6, and three additional pardons (commutations) generate 1 to 1.5 additional murders.
At any given moment, virtually all states differ in political and social attitudes, police funding and activities, and in the detailed operation of their respective criminal justice processes.
The temporary imposition of a well publicized death penalty moratorium in a given jurisdiction provides a better quasi-controlled experiment, particularly when demographic factors remain relatively stable over the sample period.
Georgia, in which the Supreme Court effectively struck down the death penalty as it then existed in many states on the grounds that it had been applied in a harsh, freakish, and arbitrary way.
Many states then re-instated the death penalty with new standards that required juries to decide on penalties separately from guilt and innocence, and to use uniform criteria in applying the death penalty.(The special circumstances deemed relevant to deciding whether capital punishment is appropriate include premeditation, the number of victims, and whether additional crimes were committed during the homicide.Although I agree with most of what you are arguing, I believe you omitted to mention one argument in defense of the death penalty.In fact, studies have proven that the death penalty is effective for reducing homicide rates.After a declaration of guilt they may be involved in the sentencing process, where questions as to mitigating circumstances will often be about mental stress and psychological history.They are also asked to predict future dangerousness and the possibility of rehabilitation.Here is a link to the article in defense of the death penalty: You wrote a very well paper, you talk about what is needed through the death penalty.I think that what you wrote had made several good points about why the death penalty is immoral.Including the point about a human's life having a large intrinsic value and that killing an individual is morally wrong is definitely a good point.We can reduce delay and costs only by abandoning the procedural safeguards and constitutional rights of suspects, defendants, and convictswith the attendant high risk of convicting the wrong person and executing the innocent.I find the evidence in favor of the death penaltys deterrent effect on homicidal behavior to be highly persuasive, leaving aside the more difficult issue of measurement of the power of the effect on a given, demographically mixed population.