No matter how thoroughly you go on to support your ideas with careful reasoning and to refute other claims (such as those held by your audience) respectfully, your readers have already decided to ignore you.
For example, can you imagine how your roomate would respond if you remark that he or she is a terrible slob?
Essentially, the Rogerian problem-solving approach reconceptualizes our goals when we argue.
Instead of assuming that an author or speaker shoudl hope to overcome an antagonistic audience with shrewd reasoning, the Rogerian approach would have the author or speaker attempt to reach some common ground with the audience.
Your quotes from world-renowned educators and philosophers and your statistics from the Stanford-Blinet or SAT, GRE, and MCAT scores would probably be dismissed as inaccurate because they threaten his assumptions.
Of course, you could hope that the chauvinist would change his mind over time when he wasn't being pressed, yet you couldn't bet on this outcome.We have realized that truth is nt a fixed, static entity that can be carried into a battle like a banner.One wonderful aspect of your college career is meeting different worldviews through books and through discussions with people whom you otherwise would not encounter.Thus, in a very real way, Rogerian "persuasion" is not a form of persuasion so much as it is a way of opening communication for negotiating common ground between divergent points of view.In terms of writing, we coud say that the Rogerian approach melds the techniques of informative analyses with those of persuasive reports.Thanks to modern scholarship and research, we have come to realize that our personalities and thoughts are shaped to some degree by cultural expectations.Philosophers have challenged us to recognize that our worlviews - our assumptions about reality, what is good, what is possible - are influenced by our day-to-day experiences.Are you categorically against animal experimentation for advancements in medicine?Do you believe that criminals who have tortured and killed people should receive the death penalty?Also, most of us dislike being told what to do and how to think, so even if our brains tell us to agree, our emotions (and egos) tell us to shut down and ignore what we are hearing.A male chauvinist who believes that women are intellectually inferior to men will be unlikely to listen to your argument that women are as intelligent as men.