Surveillance Essay

The most likely explanation would be that God doesn’t just want Adam and Eve to make the right choices; he wants them to make the right choices .

Tags: Persuasive Essay On Prison SystemTerm Papers On KodakAmerican Tragedy Essay QuestionsCommercial Real Estate Analyst Cover LetterTow Truck Business PlanCritical Thinking Essay QuestionsNineteenth-Century Piano Music Essays On Performance And AnalysisCollege Writing AssignmentsFour Stages Of Sleep EssayProblem Solving Skills Worksheets

All he wants is absolute, unquestioning obedience (which, by an amazing coincidence, also happens to be exactly what every child wants from their parents.) But God wants this obedience to be voluntary.

And, very importantly, He wants it to flow from the right motive.

On this interpretation, God is a follower of the eighteenth century German philosopher Immanuel Kant.

(This would, of course, come as no surprise to Kant.) According to Kant, our actions are right when they conform to the moral rules dictated to us by our reason, and they have moral worth insofar as they are motivated by respect for that moral law.

True, surveillance technology was in its infancy back then, but He could have managed it, and it wouldn’t have undermined Eve’s free will.

She still has a choice to make; but once she sees the camera she’s more likely to make the right choice.Stricter protections are warranted because surveillance of nationals and others with a close connection to the domestic policy poses a special threat to the political opposition and free press of a country, both of which play crucial roles in limiting abuses of state power. Your complimentary articles You’ve read one of your four complimentary articles for this month. To have complete access to the thousands of philosophy articles on this site, please Imagine that right after briefing Adam about which fruit was allowed and which forbidden, God had installed a closed-circuit television camera in the garden of Eden, trained on the tree of knowledge.The result is fewer instances of moral failure, and patterns of behaviour conducive to social harmony.A brief history of traffic surveillance illustrates the idea nicely: (‘the state of nature’): Do whatever you please – it’s a free for all. : Cops start patrolling the highways to enforce the speed limits.Does it render obsolete the Kantian emphasis on acting from a sense of duty as opposed to acting out of self-interest?Such questions fall under the rubric of a new field of research called Surveillance Impact Assessment.Think how this might have changed things for the better.The serpent sidles up to Eve and urges her to try the forbidden fruit. PDF This article addresses whether governments ever have a justified basis for treating targets of surveillance differently, in any way, based on nationality.Topics include (1) three ways nationality can matter to surveillance; (2) reasons for stricter rules for law enforcement and domestic collection; (3) reasons for different rules based on the location of collection; (4) the universalist critique of surveillance laws based on nationality; and (5) reasons that can justify stricter surveillance rules based on nationality.